Skip to content

Citing ‘hallucinated’ AI cases gets Harford divorce lawyer in trouble with Maryland Appellate Court

Baltimore Sun reporter Brendan Nordstrom. (Lloyd Fox/Staff)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
The brief contained 11 citation irregularities, including four nonexistent cases, two incorrectly cited cases and five unsupported cases. A law clerk used search engines such as CourtListener, CaseMine, and Justia, as well as ChatGPT and VLex in the divorce filing.

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To log in, click here.

RevContent Feed